The scandalous urban planning "reform", which is not signed by the president, can be tried to be pushed through the government by separate resolutions. More than one people's deputy from the "Servant of the People" party has been signaling this to me for several weeks. And it looked almost unreal and even absurd under other circumstances. The President did not sign the draft law, the European Parliament emphasized that this should not be done... But, given the 2-year history of this lobbying epic, this signal from parliamentarians should be taken very seriously. And here I pay attention not only to the information from my sources, but also to the information campaign and the information field, which is currently being actively formed. During the meeting of the committee chaired by Shulyak, the people's deputies again raised the issue of 5655 a few days ago. "5655 is supported by the NAJC and is the basis for the state anti-corruption strategy that is currently being implemented by the government," Shulyak emphasized. It turns out that what the president and our European partners did not support is the basis of the state anti-corruption strategy implemented by the government (!). Let's fix it. In addition, Shuliak's blog was published, where the head of the pro-ruling party noted: "I sincerely believe that the story of urban planning reform has a bright ending." I translate this phrase for citizens as follows: "The future of the country is in danger, because due to cooperation with developers, honest reconstruction is at risk." And now let's analyze this blog in detail to understand how myths are formed by Olena Shulyak. Who is telling lies? In his blog, the head of the Committee on the Organization of State Power and Local Self-Government assures that all those who are against urban planning "reform" simply became victims of some planned information campaign with commissioned materials. Thus, the head of the pro-ruling party devalues all expert articles in the mass media and all publications prepared by the public sector. Let me remind you that public organizations urged people's deputies not to vote for this "reform" blindly. The transcripts of the committee's deliberations have disappeared and have been missing for nearly 10 months. But the Narodovladya party managed to find one of them. And she showed society the answer to the question: "Who tells lies." Colleague Shulyak Oleksandr Kachura ("Servant of the People"), during the discussion of the project before the vote, noted that everyone had received the text of the draft law the day before and there was no time to study several thousand pages: "You sent a table of several thousand pages, probably not just to send it? And in order to be able to investigate it. My team - three lawyers - are not able to qualitatively analyze what is written. How do I vote? How do you recommend me? After all, many different things were voted on there, and then changes were made, perhaps in the discussion we would have improved the document.
How can you comment on the fact that at 7 p.m. you sent only these tables, and today is Monday, 4 p.m., and when we needed to do it - two thousand pages? That is, I don't know, I don't know the contraction, as they say." If society was misled about 5655, it is the fault of the author of the bill, Olena Shulyak. And it was done on purpose. Even her colleagues directly said before the vote that it was impossible to read so many pages. What was the hurry? If we had given time for familiarization, there would be no votes! When the experts were able to study the text of 5655 after the vote, the society learned that the citizens will in fact not influence the developers in any way, and the project carries corruption risks. What is interesting, when you familiarize yourself with Shulyak's blog on mind.ua, it says that it is essentially an extract from her interview, which she gave to the publication, and it consists of 2 parts (the first and the second).
But in the interview itself, you will not see anything detailed about 5655. And journalists should then ask the head of the committee about the missing transcripts, about the quotes of her colleagues who claimed that it is impossible to get acquainted with the text, and about why she devalues the statements of the public sector , who spoke against 5655. But instead Shulyak was given this part to be put in the blog. This is nothing more than removing responsibility from the editors and giving politicians a platform to spread their myths. And this is not the first "interview - warm bath" arranged by the head of the "Servant of the People" media party. Was there "constructive cooperation" with OPZZH? Previously, Shulyak, who herself publicly called cooperation with people's deputies elected from the banned OPZZ party, constructive. Now the rhetoric has changed. In her blog, she called the fact that the votes of the representatives of this political force were decisive.
The official website of the Verkhovna Rada contains the results of roll-call voting, which every citizen checks. 228 People's Deputies voted for the project, which the media called the urban rape reform. The necessary minimum, I remind you, is 226 votes. In other words, cancel the votes of the figure in the Shufr Register of Traitors
