ACTUAL

As 2024 begins, violent political threats to American democracy are on the rise

Rusty Bauers, the former Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, who played a key role in confronting attempts to cancel the 2020 presidential election, came to his area east of Phoenix the next day after Christmas to see the horrible scene.

His house, located on a soil road in the unfinished part of the desert, was surrounded by sheriff's assistants. The unknown reported that there is a homemade bomb inside and a woman killed.

After the search in the house and interrogation of the wife and grandson of Bauers, according to Bauers and the authorities, Sheriff's deputies found that no statement was true.

The incident with a blow, a jocular call to emergency services, aimed at the reaction of law enforcement agencies, became not just a terrible moment for Bauerz and his family. It was one of many violent threats and intimidation acts that determined the lives of different officials after the 2020 elections. And now they throw a shadow on the 2024 campaign, as Americans are preparing to vote during the primary elections that will start this month.

Those who accept the wide range of America's democratic system, including members of Congress, government officials, local leaders and judges. While some are outstanding, others have relatively minor roles. The intensity has accelerated in recent weeks.
The threats of the explosion last week caused evacuation in the Capitol buildings throughout the country. The federal authorities arrested and accused the man of a threat to the murder of Congressman and his children, while other members of Congress were engaged in the incidents. State Secretary of the State of Men and the Supreme Court of Colorado, who recently recognized Donald Trump as who had no right to run for the president because he participated in the uprising, received a wave of threats after Trump criticized them in speeches and publications on social networks.
Police responded to a probable attempt to be beaten on Sunday night in Tanya S. Summary, a federal judge who was considering Trump's case to undermine elections in the Colombia County, according to a person familiar with this issue, and a family member of the Chatkan who wished to remain anonymous. Since the incident is being investigated.
On Friday, Prosecutor General Merrick Garrick called a wave of threats to civil servants a "deeply alarming splash." Although some of the right were injured, many goals have a common feature: they did or said something that caused Trump's anger.
Experts say that acts of physical violence against officials and politicians after the attack of the Protrampivsky crowd on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021 remain relatively rare. But they warn that the possibility of harming civil servants is already undermining the health of American democracy, as intimidation risks affecting their decision -making. Officials who have become a target say they fear that threats can ever develop into physical violence.
« I am really worried that the tragedy will happen, ”said Judge Visconsin Jill Karofski in an interview with the Supreme Court. “I believe people when they say they want to make us hurt or kill. I don't think it's empty threats. "

The members of the Visconsin Supreme Court suffered a wave of threats-many of them are gemenic and anti-Semitic-after they made 4-3 decisions in December 2020 to support Joe Baiden's victory over Trump.

Since then, the court has continued to receive threats, including threats on Thursday, which came to the office of the court secretary. Conservatives dominated the court for many years, but after the election last year, it has a liberal majority, which began to resolve key political issues, including the redistribution of state laws.

Karofski, who is part of this minor majority, said she was considering threats as an attempt to intimidate judges to change their decisions.

« I think that the right people are mostly radical ... trying to influence the judicial system with an anti -democratic way, ”she said. “This is because of intimidation. It is because of threats. It's because of violence. "
In Wednesday, the threat of explosion was forced to evacuate, close or strengthen security measures in more than a dozen state capitals in Connecticuta, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigani, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montani, Wisconsin, Hawai, Men, Oklahomi, Illini, Aya. Arizona. The FBI stated that they have no information that would testify to the accuracy of threats. According to officials and local media, on Thursday, additional threats to Security in Arkansas, Florida, Man, Mississippi and Wisconsini were reported.

The day before Sheriff's assistants surrounded the Bauers House, an incident that was not previously reported - Margor Taylor Green, a Republican from Georgia, became the object of attempting to be beaten for Christmas. According to reports on social networks, both politicians and local media, there was also Congressman Brandon Williams, a Republican from New York. On Wednesday, Florida's federal authorities arrested a man and accused him of a threat by killing Congressman Eric Sulwell (California) and his children.

"This is just a small picture of a greater trend that included threats to domestic violence, provides our safe trips, teaches our children, reports news, presents its voters and ensures the safety of our communities," Garland told reporters. “These threats of violence are unacceptable. They threaten our structure of democracy. "

He said the officials of the Ministry of Justice worked to fight such threats for many years and met on Friday to "determine how we can double these efforts in the New Year."

Stephen Levitsky, Professor of Harvard Government, which studies democracy around the world, said that politicians and election workers are suffering from life, are often forced to take new security measures or other guarantees.

It also affects decision making as officials try to do their work safely. Violent threats "make us less democratic political system" because they change political incentives, Levitsky said. Politicians, for example, have recognized that they have changed their voices because of the fear of their families.

Levitsky noted that although violent threats cover the political spectrum, the "vast majority" comes from activists and other far -right. It is important that these threats are often not discouraged by their representatives in the government, he said. Instead, Trump and others sometimes encouraged and justified this behavior.

For example, the Congressman Eliza Stephanik (Rn.y.) in the Meet The Press program on the NBC channel last weekend stated that she condemned violence, but she also repeated Trump's description of those who were imprisoned for their role in the violent rebellion on January 6, as "hostages".
The absence of large -scale political violence after the uprising on January 6 does not ensure the safety of people, added Levitsky, because so much "fictional violence" unfolds on social networks. Such threats have "acute effect, preventing people from doing their work," said Liliana Mason, Associate Professor of Political Science, John Hopkins, Department of Political Science. In the long run, people can refuse to run for positions or participate in the election work, added Mason, who is a co -author of the book "Radical American Party. »

"So it not only intimidates people who hold a position, but also changes the appearance of expectant people who will occupy positions," Mason said.

A study of the initiative of overcoming the differences between Princeton University, which, together with Civicpulse, monitors political violence and threats aimed at election officials, has shown that women and color people who are much more likely to threaten violence are also more likely to move away from work.

Law enforcement agencies are often advised to victims of threats and combat attacks not to discuss publicly the difficulties that cause such attacks, according to several victims of hostilities who wished to remain anonymous to describe their experience. The culprits of such threats often want to confirm that they have caused fear or anxiety. These people say that they only inspire them to know that they have succeeded.

But officials also said that it is also important for the public to know when officials are threatened for doing their work.

State Secretary of the State of Minne Shenna Bellouse, who at the end of December removed Trump from the Presidential Presidential Elections in accordance with the constitutional rebellion point, became the subject of criticism the next day after she made public.

"I was ready for anger, shocks and critics," Bellouse said, Democrat, in an interview. “But I was not ready for aggressive and threatening messages not only to me but also to my family members. I was also not ready for this incident. "

According to the State Security Department of the State of Ministry, an unknown man called emergency services and said he had penetrated Bellouz. Bellouse and her husband were not at home at the time, and law enforcement agencies were "reacted perfectly and efficiently, and they were very sociable," Bellouse said.

The incident, she added "seemed to be directed to send me a message to make me silence or inspire fear, and it is unacceptable."

On Wednesday, Gabriel Sterling, the Chief Operational and Financial Director of the State Secretary of the Secretary of State Georgia, called the police chief in his hometown Sandy Springs in the Atlanta suburbs and asked if everything was fine with him. The police chief received a call about the active threat at home Sterling.

Sterling arrived home up to 14 police cars near his house.

"This is most annoyed," Sterling, a Republican, said in an interview. "The purpose of these things, no matter who does it, is to multiply panic and concern and spend emotional and real resources for people."

Sterling was a key election official in Georgia during the 2020 presidential election. He strongly opposed Trump's attempts to question the results of the elections and threats to election workers after the vote.

"Someone will hurt," Sterling said then. “Someone will be shot. Someone will be killed. "

Sterling called this warning prophetic, considering how much the threats of violence became. In response to such intimidation, "you put on a pants for a big boy and continue to do your job," he said. "You do not allow people who are trying to undermine institutes, undermine institutions."

Like sterling, Bauers were repeatedly threatened and persecuted after the 2020 elections. He was on behalf of the law enforcement agencies received a call about a fake message about a killed woman and a pipe bomb in his home. His wife and adult grandson were inside when police appeared.

"All this is simply quenching," said Bauers, who testified in 2022, together with Sterling, before the House of Representatives Committee, which investigates the attack on January 6 , The Washington Post. "I don't know if someone is trying to make our lives unhappy or why, and there is just uncertainty."

Karofski, Judge of the Visconsin Supreme Court, said that she considers it important to inform the public what officials are dealing with.

"We are at a time when our democracy is literally struck and we need to understand whether we are just about to pass it on to a group of rebels who think it is quite normal to use violence and intimidation to get decisions they want to get in the courtroom," Karofski said. “Will we have democracy where people adhere to the rule of law? And if I do not support, and if other people do not support and we will not talk about it, we will lose this battle. "

DON'T MISS IT

INTERESTING MATERIALS ON THE TOPIC