The mobilization policy of the Government of Ukraine causes a sharp criticism and misunderstanding, especially among economic experts. The analyst Alexei Kush emphasizes the inconsistent actions of the Cabinet of Ministers, which only strengthen the chaos in the labor market and undermine confidence in government initiatives. According to him, at first government mobilization policy contributed to shadowing the labor market, and now tries to pull people out of the shadows by mass presentations of stories that do not solve the problem, but only deepen it.
At the beginning of mobilization measures, the government put responsibility for organizing mobilization on business, which obliged employers not only to report their employees, but also, in fact, to assist with the delivery of stories and the organization of delivery to the Tax Code (territorial centers of acquisition). This pressure, which actually made entrepreneurs with mediators between the state and employees, has led to undesirable consequences. According to the bush, the companies, seeking to save key employees, began to translate them massively to unofficial employment, which allowed to avoid responsibility to the state, but at the same time sharply reduced taxes.
The recent statement of Prime Minister Denis Schmigal that 98% of stories are directed to people who do not officially work or pay taxes have doubts. According to the analyst, such data do not reflect reality, since a large number of those who have left official employment were actually forced to do so through government policies.
The bush indicates that the main problem of the mobilization strategy is the lack of long -term social dialogue between the state and business. A policy reminiscent of the Soviet model of government, where people and enterprises are regarded as a resource to achieve short -term goals, does not contribute to solving problems in the labor market. Decommunization, as the bush emphasizes, took place only at the surface level, while many officials are still prevalent in the thinking of many officials.
Criticizing the inconsistency of the actions, the bush calls the government's mobilization measures "creepy layers from side to side." Policy is aimed at maximum pressure on the official labor market, then attempts to "catch" people in a shadow economy, without any long -term strategy for stabilizing employment and mobilization measures.
The actions of the government during mobilization not only demonstrate the lack of consistency, but also indicate a lack of a human -centric approach to the formation of a policy that should take into account the interests of workers and business. According to the bush, government measures do not solve the fundamental problems of the labor market and mobilization, but, on the contrary, contribute to the growth of distrust of the state and increased shadowing of the economy.
