In their latest report, The New York Times considered the views of Ukraine's defense forces on the strategic importance of territories that seemingly not of particular importance. Despite the doubts from some American colleagues, the Ukrainian military claim that the defense of such zones causes significant losses to the Russian forces.
In his description of the situation in the front line in the Zaporozhye region, the publication indicates the activation of Russian troops in the territories that were previously released by Ukrainian troops during the summer counter -offensive in 2023. In particular, it is noted that Russian troops are trying to translate control over a robot area.
According to NYT, the situation for the defenders of the robot is quite difficult - they are surrounded on three sides, which creates a dilemma: to retreat from this position can relieve pressure, but it will also be perceived as a symbolic failure. Ukrainian fighters who have been fighting in the area told NYT about minor changes in the front line and about intensive artillery shelling by Russian troops.
Deputy Minister of Defense Ivan Havrylyuk emphasized that Russia is much exceeding Ukraine in terms of the number of artillery shells released. The United States is known to support Ukraine, in particular, with the supply of Stryker armored vehicles for a counter -offensive, which helps Ukrainian defenders to hold positions. However, a delay in the Congress on the adoption of a $ 60 billion assistance package can jeopardize weapons.
According to NYT, a robot, a former town with about 500 inhabitants, has now turned into ruins. US officials are concerned that Ukraine is holding defense in such places, but for Ukrainian defenders, these territories are still of great importance.
Experts emphasize that military events indicate the strategic importance of symbolic territories. According to the former adviser to the Minister of Defense Yuri Sak, the maintenance of control over reinforcements plays an important role in supporting the morale and morality of the population, and also puts the faith in victory.
The Sak noted that the attacks of Russian troops were more expensive than Ukrainian defenders in defense. The military also noted the advantage of the transition to a defense strategy, as this leads to a decrease in losses. At the same time, the invaders continue the offensive throughout the front line, using their advantage in ammunition, living strength and aviation.
