Recent statements of Ukrainian officials on the possibility of nuclear weapons have attracted the attention of the world community. Analysts, in particular Alexei Kopitko, urge these statements not only as a reaction to military threats, but also as a strategic tool in great politics. This situation poses a number of serious questions and challenges before the event.
About the nuclear bimba. Because somehow they do not notice the obvious.
After what happened to Ukraine, all who doubted before, were now guaranteed to make their nuclear weapons.
Nobody will declare it, but they will make efforts. And probably they do it.
There are no arguments against the acquisition of their own nuclear weapons in different countries, there is only a moment of ability to realize the idea and the question of the dynamics of this process.
There are no arguments - because there is no alternative. There is no way to guarantee your safety, except to create excessive risks for those who are not ready to accept them.
This simple opinion has come to our partners since February 2022. And by February, they emphasized what the situation would arise if they did not affect Russia. And the situation came about.
Moreover, in the winter of 2024, the staff of the apocalypse Sergey Karaganov founded the idea: Russia should distribute nuclear weapons to loyal countries. Controlled spreading is a candy that has a Kremlin, but there is no West. One of the hypostasis Brix is a club of non -watery rulers and contenders for nuclear weapons.
There is only one thing to stop this praise: a demonstration of Putin's nuclear terrorist and his accomplices, as well as establishing international control over the nuclear arsenal of the Russian Federation. In Washington and the world capitals, they are well aware of it. There is no other way!
Various speakers in the West can now begin to condemn Ukraine as a NATO or NATO fork. Although there is no argument why Ukraine should not ask the problem so.
If you get the victim of aggression (and, moreover, if you blackmail the help), it will not help, and on the contrary - only the submission of the applicants for the charters.
NATO cannot, it is impossible, it is possible only to die heroically - it is a very unattractive model.
I do not see anything wrong that they have marked as a possible (I emphasize - not a mandatory, but possible) political goal for Ukraine. With the national consensus and consistent efforts, not for this president, so the next or one Ukraine will be able to solve this task.
Now it will not be part of the political discussion. And you know what is most dramatic for partners? If Ukraine is losing and there will be some control of Russia, it will be nominally nuclear by Moscow.
That is, it is not about our country for a long time. Nuclear gin was released from the bottle. Adequate actions are required to control it.
But the very idea that such global issues will have to be resolved, causes nervous tremor in those who are in status. This is visible. Now this is their question, not Ukraine. We can either help or worsen their position. Let something offer because they look the whole world.
